Under Armour Australia Sustainability - SustainabilityTracker.com

Sustainability Summary

Good On You - Not good enough (2/5 Planet, 2/5 People, 3/5 Animals)
Ethical Consumer - This information is locked, visit Ethical Consumer's website
B Corp - No
Trustpilot - 1.5/5 (1,370 reviews)
This is an unclaimed profile. Under Armour Australia has not joined Sustainability Tracker to verify their sustainability credentials. We gathered what we could from public sources.

Under Armour Australia shows some real sustainability work, but independent ratings say it is still far from a strong performer. The brand publishes a sustainability report and shares emissions data, supplier information, and some supply chain policies. It also has science-based emissions targets and says it is working on materials, energy use, and single-use plastics. At the same time, third-party assessors say it is off track on key climate goals, still relies heavily on high-emission materials, and does not clearly show strong action on packaging, repair, or take-back programs. Public review sites also show very weak customer sentiment overall.

Positive Sentiment Found
There are a few positive signals in the third-party material. Good On You says Under Armour uses some lower-impact materials, including recycled materials, and gives it an overall sustainability rating of “Not good enough,” with a 2 out of 5 for Planet, 2 out of 5 for People, and 3 out of 5 for Animals. The Commons Earth gives the brand a strong 5 out of 5 for Accountability, saying it publishes a detailed annual sustainability and impact report, reports emissions by scope, and shares supplier information. It also notes that the company has science-based emissions targets approved by the SBTi (Science Based Targets initiative, which checks climate goals against climate science), even though it says the brand is off track.

Common Criticisms:
The strongest public signal is negative. Trustpilot shows very poor customer sentiment, with Under Armour rated 1.5 out of 5 from 1,370 reviews on the Australian page and 1.4 out of 5 from 98 reviews on the European page. Good On You rates the brand “Not good enough” overall and says there is no evidence of strong action on packaging, biodiversity, or living wages across most of the supply chain. The Commons Earth also says the brand is off track on its emissions and renewable electricity targets, still appears to rely on virgin plastic packaging, and does not offer repair or take-back programs. It also notes gaps in its supplier code, including no clear living wage rule and no environmental clauses.

About Under Armour Australia

Status
Unverified

Website
Visit Website

Under Armour Australia Sustainability Actions

Publishes sustainability reporting

Under Armour publishes a sustainability page and an annual sustainability and impact report. Independent reviewers say the report gives high-level details about the company’s climate strategy and progress. The company also shares emissions data by scope, which means it breaks emissions into direct emissions, purchased energy, and other indirect emissions across its value chain. This kind of reporting helps outside readers see where the biggest climate impacts come from and whether the company is making progress.

12 13

Tracks and reports emissions

The brand measures and publicly reports its greenhouse gas emissions with help from a third party. Its most recent reported footprint was 1,662,514 tons of CO2e, which means carbon dioxide equivalent, a way to combine different greenhouse gases into one number. Independent assessors say it identifies its main emissions driver and reports by scope. This gives a clearer picture of its climate impact, even though reviewers say the company is still off track on its reduction goals.

Uses some lower-impact materials

Good On You says Under Armour uses some lower-impact materials, including recycled materials. The Commons Earth also says the brand uses some lower-emission materials, but still appears to rely heavily on high-emission and synthetic materials such as polyester, cotton, and elastane. This suggests the company has started to shift its material mix, but not enough to remove the larger climate impact from its products.

12 13

Shares supplier and labor policies

Under Armour publishes information about some of its supply chain partners, including names and locations for final-stage manufacturing. It also shares a supplier code of conduct that bans forced labor and child labor and supports collective bargaining, which is the right of workers to join together and negotiate. The Commons Earth says the company regularly audits supply chain partners and is linked to the Fair Labor Association, a group that checks labor standards. However, it also notes gaps such as no clear living wage rule across most of the supply chain.

8 12

Works on energy and plastics

The company says it has started using some renewable energy in its owned and operated facilities and has targets to expand that use. It also says it is working to reduce single-use plastics in packaging. Independent reviewers say it is still off track on both energy and packaging goals, and that its packaging materials are not clearly disclosed. That means outside readers cannot easily tell how much virgin plastic it still uses.

7 12 13

Under Armour Australia Sustainability Commitments

2030

Use only recycled polyester

Under Armour says it plans to use only recycled polyester by 2030. Polyester is a common synthetic fabric made from fossil fuels, so switching to recycled polyester can lower material impact if the change is real and large enough. Independent reviewers say the company has reported progress on this goal, but it appears to be off track so far.

Frequently Asked Questions

Has Under Armour Australia published a sustainability report?

Confidence: High. As of July 2026, Under Armour has published a sustainability page and an annual sustainability and impact report. The Commons Earth says the report gives detailed progress updates and climate information, not just broad claims. It also says the company reports emissions by scope and shares supplier information. Consumers who want the latest details can check the company’s sustainability reporting page and annual report directly.. Sources: The Commons Earth, Under Armour ESG page - https://brands.thecommons.earth/brand-rating/196/under-armour, http://www.underarmour.com.au/esg

What is Under Armour Australia's sustainability rating?

Confidence: High. As of July 2026, Good On You rates Under Armour “Not good enough,” with 2 out of 5 for Planet, 2 out of 5 for People, and 3 out of 5 for Animals. Good On You is an independent fashion rating site that checks public information on climate, labour, and animal welfare. The Commons Earth also gives the brand an overall Insufficient rating. Together, these ratings suggest the brand has some reporting in place, but not enough strong action yet.. Sources: Good On You, The Commons Earth - https://directory.goodonyou.eco/brand/under-armour, https://brands.thecommons.earth/brand-rating/196/under-armour

What sustainability certifications does Under Armour Australia have?

Confidence: Moderate. As of July 2026, the clearest third-party-linked certification mentioned is that Under Armour’s final production stage is certified by the Fair Labor Association (FLA), a group that reviews labor standards in supply chains. The Commons Earth also says the company has SBTi-approved emissions reduction targets, meaning the Science Based Targets initiative has checked the climate goals against science. However, no product-level certifications were clearly listed in the material provided. Consumers can ask the brand for a full, current certification list.. Sources: Good On You, The Commons Earth - https://directory.goodonyou.eco/brand/under-armour, https://brands.thecommons.earth/brand-rating/196/under-armour

What is Under Armour Australia's carbon footprint?

Confidence: Moderate. As of July 2026, The Commons Earth says Under Armour’s most recent estimated emissions footprint was 1,662,514 tons of CO2e for FY2023. CO2e means carbon dioxide equivalent, which combines different greenhouse gases into one number. The same source says the company reports emissions by scope and identifies its main emissions driver. It also says the brand is off track on its emissions reduction target, so the footprint is still a major issue.. Sources: The Commons Earth - https://brands.thecommons.earth/brand-rating/196/under-armour

Is Under Armour Australia's packaging sustainable?

Confidence: Low. As of July 2026, Under Armour has said it is working to reduce single-use plastics, but the available third-party material says its packaging is still not clearly disclosed and appears to rely on virgin plastic. That means the public cannot easily see how much recycled or reusable packaging it uses. The Commons Earth also says the company is off track on its packaging target. Consumers who care about packaging can ask the brand for a breakdown of materials and plastic use.. Sources: The Commons Earth, Under Armour environment page - https://brands.thecommons.earth/brand-rating/196/under-armour, http://www.underarmour.com.au/environment

Is Under Armour Australia ethical in its supply chain?

Confidence: Moderate. As of July 2026, Under Armour shares some supplier names and locations and has a supplier code of conduct that bans forced labor and child labor and supports collective bargaining. Good On You says the brand sources much of its final production from countries with high labour-risk levels, and The Commons Earth says its code still lacks some protections, including a clear living wage rule across most of the supply chain. The picture is mixed: there are policies, but important gaps remain.. Sources: Good On You, The Commons Earth - https://directory.goodonyou.eco/brand/under-armour, https://brands.thecommons.earth/brand-rating/196/under-armour

What is Under Armour Australia doing about sustainability?

Confidence: High. As of July 2026, Under Armour says it is publishing sustainability reports, tracking emissions, using some recycled materials, and working toward more renewable energy and less single-use plastic. It also says it plans to use only recycled polyester by 2030. Independent reviewers confirm that the brand has reporting and targets in place, but they also say it is off track on key goals and still depends heavily on high-emission materials. So the company is doing several things, but progress appears limited so far.. Sources: Under Armour ESG page, Good On You, The Commons Earth - http://www.underarmour.com.au/esg, https://directory.goodonyou.eco/brand/under-armour, https://brands.thecommons.earth/brand-rating/196/under-armour

Sustainability Summary

Under Armour Australia Sustainability Profile

Sustainability Summary

About Under Armour Australia