Victorias Secret Lingerie Mnf Sustainability Profile

Victoria’s Secret & Co. says sustainability is part of how it runs the business, with a focus on women, supply chain traceability, lower-impact materials, waste reduction, and governance. It has published ESG reports and says its board and executive teams oversee progress. Independent sources give a mixed picture: Good On You rates the brand “Not Good Enough,” while The Commons Earth says it has measured emissions and publishes some supply chain data. The brand also reports work on recycled materials, circular product design, packaging changes, and supplier standards. At the same time, third-party reviews and ratings suggest there is still a long way to go on transparency, emissions targets, and broader environmental impact.

Positive Sentiment Found
Publicly available coverage shows some positive signals around Victoria’s Secret’s sustainability work. The Commons Earth says the company has measured and verified its emissions, publishes some supply chain data, and uses some renewable energy in offices and production. It also notes efforts on packaging and lower-impact materials. WWD reported that the company’s first ESG report included data on workforce diversity, recycled polyester and polyamide use, and a 2030 target for certified chemicals. Good On You’s article also confirms the brand has taken some steps on materials and governance, even though it still rated the company poorly overall. Together, these sources suggest the brand has started building a more formal ESG program, with some visible progress on reporting, materials, and operations.

Common Criticisms:
Independent sources also show clear criticism. Good On You rated Victoria’s Secret “Not Good Enough,” saying it found too few eco-friendly materials, no clear policy on microplastics or textile waste, weak transparency, and no evidence of living-wage protections in the supply chain. The Commons Earth gave the brand an “Insufficient+” sustainability rating and said it still relies mostly on high-emission materials, has no emissions reduction targets it could find, and makes sustainability information hard for shoppers to find. Trustpilot reviews are also weak, with a 1.6 out of 5 score from 2,932 reviews on the main site page, which points to broad customer dissatisfaction, though those reviews are not limited to sustainability issues. Overall, the public picture is mixed to negative, with progress in reporting but major gaps in targets, transparency, and material choices.