Sustainability Summary
- Good On You - Not good enough (2/5 Planet, 2/5 People, 2/5 Animals)
- Ethical Consumer - This information is locked, visit Ethical Consumer's website
- B Corp - Not found
- Trustpilot - 1.4/5 (2,073 reviews)
- This is an unclaimed profile. Urban Outfitters Direct has not joined Sustainability Tracker to verify their sustainability credentials. We gathered what we could from public sources.
Urban Outfitters shows a mixed sustainability picture. Its parent company, URBN, says it has an Impact platform focused on respect for people and the planet, and it publishes annual impact reports. It also points to circular fashion through Nuuly and some lower-impact materials in parts of its range. But independent ratings say the brand still relies heavily on high-emission and synthetic materials, gives limited detail on packaging, and does not publish enough data on emissions, water use, or supply chain traceability. Public ratings also suggest weak transparency and only limited action on key environmental and labour issues. Positive Sentiment Found Positive public signals are limited, but a few independent sources point to some progress. Good On You rates Urban Outfitters “Not good enough,” yet still notes that it uses some lower-impact materials and trains designers to improve product circularity, which means making clothes easier to reuse or recycle. The Commons Earth says the brand is a member of the Better Cotton Initiative, has some renewable energy use in EU operations, and has a small take-back pilot for jeans. questionZERO gives Urban Outfitters a 5.2 out of 10 sustainability score and says it is around the industry average, with stronger marks for energy management, environmental certifications, community engagement, and data privacy. These signals suggest some action, but not a strong sustainability reputation. Common Criticisms: The strongest public sentiment is negative. Good On You rates Urban Outfitters “Not good enough” and gives it 2/5 for Planet, 2/5 for People, and 2/5 for Animals, saying it lacks adequate action on hazardous chemicals, living wages, and animal welfare. The Commons Earth also gives a bad rating and says the brand still relies on high-emission materials, gives little detail on packaging, does not publish emissions tracking, and has no clear emissions reduction targets at brand level. Trustpilot reviews are also weak on the main site, with a 1.4/5 score from about 2,073 reviews, and another listing at 1.3/5 from about 2,066 reviews, with complaints about order problems and product quality. A separate academic report also describes past backlash over governance and social issues, including a resale of Truly Organic products that were later accused of false organic or vegan claims.
Urban Outfitters Direct Sustainability Actions
Urban Outfitters Direct Sustainability Commitments
2027
Reduce high-emission materials
The Commons Earth says URBN has 2027 goals to reduce its reliance on high-emission materials, including cotton and viscose sourcing and broader raw material sourcing. This means the company plans to change what fibres it buys and uses in its products. The source also says URBN has reported progress on these goals in the last year.
2025
Set science-based targets
The Commons Earth says URBN has a 2025 goal to set science-based targets, which are climate goals based on climate science rather than vague promises. These targets are usually used to guide real cuts in greenhouse gas emissions. The source says it could not find public evidence of emissions reduction targets for Urban Outfitters itself.