Sustainability Summary
- Good On You - 3/5 (Planet), 3/5 (People), 3/5 (Animals)
- Ethical Consumer - This information is locked, visit Ethical Consumer's website
- B Corp - Not found
- Trustpilot - 1.5/5 (577 reviews)
- This is an unclaimed profile. Ugg Boot Factory The has not joined Sustainability Tracker to verify their sustainability credentials. We gathered what we could from public sources.
UGG shows a mixed sustainability picture. Independent sources say the brand uses some lower-impact materials, like recycled polyester, organic cotton, sugarcane EVA, and certified leather and wool. Its parent company, Deckers, also reports emissions data, renewable energy use in owned facilities, and science-based climate targets. At the same time, reviewers and rating sites say UGG still relies on high-impact animal materials and does not share enough detail on packaging, supplier oversight, or product circularity. Public feedback is also weak, with very low Trustpilot scores for several UGG review pages. Positive Sentiment Found Positive public signals are limited, but a few independent sources point to some progress. Good On You gives UGG an overall rating of “It’s a start,” with 3 out of 5 in Planet, People, and Animals, which suggests the brand has some policies and materials in place but is not a leader. Commons rates UGG “Acceptable+” and notes that it uses some lower-emissions materials, reports emissions at the parent-company level, and offers paid repairs plus a one-year warranty. Better Trail gives the Ugg Butte a 4.2/5 sustainability score and highlights recycled polyester, PFAS-free waterproofing, and leather from LWG-certified suppliers. These sources suggest the brand has made measurable steps, even if the progress is uneven. Common Criticisms: The strongest public signal is negative customer feedback. Trustpilot pages for UGG show very low scores, including 1.5/5 from 577 reviews on ugg.co.uk, 1.7/5 from 88 reviews on uggoriginals.com.au, and 1.4/5 from 296 reviews on uggaustralia.com. The complaints shown include poor product quality, bad customer service, and a report of electric shocks from a pair of slippers. On the sustainability side, independent reviewers say UGG still relies on high-impact animal materials, does not publish a full breakdown of materials used, and does not clearly share packaging details. Commons also says the brand does not offer a take-back program and does not show strong evidence of living-wage protections or regular supplier audits, which leaves gaps in transparency and worker oversight.
Ugg Boot Factory The Sustainability Actions
Ugg Boot Factory The Sustainability Commitments
2025
Eliminate hazardous chemicals
Good On You says UGG has set a target to eliminate hazardous chemicals after 2025. Hazardous chemicals are substances that can harm workers, water, or ecosystems if they are not managed carefully. The rating site also says the brand claims it is on track for this target. This is a future commitment with a clear year, so it belongs here rather than in actions.
2030
Cut greenhouse gas emissions
Good On You says UGG has set a science-based target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in both its direct operations and its supply chain. Science-based targets are climate goals checked against what climate science says is needed. The source does not give the full target year in the snippet, but it does say the brand has a formal emissions-reduction target in place. If a more specific year is needed, it is not publicly visible in the provided material.