The Real Mccoy Snackfood Co Sustainability Profile

Snackbrands Australia says it is trying to cut waste, use less plastic, and lower emissions across its snack business. It has published sustainability pages that mention packaging changes, recycling support, climate targets, and food safety standards. Independent sources also show mixed signals: some third-party assessments note progress on packaging and palm oil, while others raise concerns about deforestation risk and withdrawn organic certification. Overall, the picture is one of a large snack maker that has set out several environmental goals and has made some operational changes, but its public record still looks uneven and not fully transparent.

Positive Sentiment Found
Public sentiment is mixed, but there are some positive signals. On B Corp, Snackbrands’ related company listing shows a certified B Corporation score of 93.3, which is a strong result for a certification that checks social and environmental performance, accountability, and transparency. Independent sources also note a packaging performance level of 4 out of 5 from APCO, the Australian Packaging Covenant Organisation, which suggests leading packaging management in Australia. The Commons Earth also presents the brand in a sustainability-focused shopping context, and its platform says it helps people choose brands with better values. Together, these sources suggest the company has made visible progress on packaging, climate planning, and some supply-chain issues, even if the picture is not complete.

Common Criticisms:
There are also clear concerns in third-party sources. Trustpilot reviews for McCoy’s, which appear linked to the same wider snack business, show low customer ratings of 1.8 out of 5 from 96 reviews, and another Trustpilot page for KP Snacks shows 2.1 out of 5 from 36 reviews. Ethical.org.au says the company’s palm oil scorecard result from WWF was 10.61 out of 24 and described it as lagging behind on palm oil sustainability. The same source also says an organic certification was withdrawn in February 2024, which means a previous certification was removed. It also notes broader deforestation and supply-chain concerns through Forest 500 and other assessments. These signals point to gaps in transparency and uneven performance across environmental topics.