Sustainability Summary
- Good On You - Good
- Ethical Consumer - This information is locked, visit Ethical Consumer's website
- B Corp - Not listed
- Trustpilot - 1.4/5 (2,137 reviews)
- This is an unclaimed profile. The North Face has not joined Sustainability Tracker to verify their sustainability credentials. We gathered what we could from public sources.
The North Face shows a mixed sustainability picture. Independent rating sites say it has made real progress on materials, circular design, packaging, and emissions targets, but they also note gaps in transparency and living wage coverage. Good On You rates the brand “Good” overall, while The Commons Earth rates it “Acceptable.” Consumer review sites show very weak service and product satisfaction, which does not directly measure sustainability but does affect the brand’s wider reputation. The brand is linked to recycled and certified materials, repair and take-back services, and science-based climate targets through its parent company VF Corp. Still, several sources say it does not publish enough detail on its full material mix, emissions data, or supplier pay. Positive Sentiment Found Independent sustainability reviewers give The North Face a fairly strong but not top-tier reputation. Good On You rates it “Good” overall, with a 4/5 Planet score, 3/5 People score, and 4/5 Animals score, saying it has solid water-use policies, circular design, and a formal animal welfare policy. The Commons Earth rates it “Acceptable” and points to repair services, a take-back program, and SBTi-approved emissions targets through VF Corp as real strengths. A separate review also says the brand has made progress on materials, packaging, and fair-labor policies, and notes a 61-70% score in the 2021 Fashion Transparency Index, which measures how much a brand discloses about its supply chain and worker protection. Common Criticisms: The main criticism across third-party sources is that The North Face still does not share enough detail. Good On You says it does not publish an aggregate breakdown of materials and is not taking enough steps to ensure a living wage for workers. The Commons Earth says its emissions reporting lacks full CO2e numbers by scope, which means the brand does not clearly show all of its climate pollution in one place. A review on Impakter also says the brand has a transparency problem and points to a 2014 sweatshop-labor accusation, followed by an apology from VF. Consumer review sites are also very negative, with Trustpilot scores of 1.4/5 from 2,137 reviews on the main site, 1.8/5 from 165 reviews in the Netherlands, and 1.3/5 from 346 reviews in the UK.
About The North Face
- Status
- Unverified
- Website
- Visit Website
The North Face Sustainability Actions
The North Face Sustainability Commitments
2025
Remove single-use plastic packaging
The North Face has said it wants to eliminate single-use plastic packaging by 2025. It also says it is working to make packaging materials more recyclable. This is a future target, so it belongs in commitments rather than actions. The goal is to cut waste from shipping and product packaging.
2025
Use better main materials
The brand has set a goal for all primary materials, including polyester, cotton, and nylon, to be recycled, responsibly sourced, or regeneratively grown by 2025 for apparel. A separate review says this target also applies to footwear and equipment by 2030. Regenerative materials are grown in ways meant to help soil health and reduce harm.
2026
Expand renewable energy use
VF Corp, The North Face’s parent company, plans to expand renewable energy to 100% across owned or leased facilities by 2026. Renewable energy means power from sources like wind or solar instead of fossil fuels. This target sits at the parent-company level, but it affects the brand’s wider sustainability profile.