Supreme Five Sustainability Profile

Supreme has a mixed sustainability profile. Independent rating data says it has some useful policies in place, especially for checking suppliers and animal welfare, but it still has clear gaps on materials, chemicals, and worker pay. Good On You rates it as “It’s a start,” which means the brand shows some basic action but is not yet strong across the board. The brand is also linked to a science-based emissions target, but Good On You says it is not on track. Public customer feedback is much weaker on service, with low Trustpilot scores for the main Supreme store. Overall, the picture is one of partial progress with major room to improve.

Positive Sentiment Found
Positive public sentiment is limited, but there are a few useful signals. Good On You gives Supreme an overall rating of “It’s a start,” with stronger marks for people and animals than for planet issues. It says the brand has a formal animal welfare policy, some wool and down are certified under the Responsible Wool Standard and Responsible Down Standard, and most animal-derived materials are traced to the first production stage. It also notes that Supreme received 61-70% in the 2023 Fashion Transparency Index, which suggests a moderate level of public disclosure. These are signs of some structure and reporting, even though the brand still has major gaps.

Common Criticisms:
Negative sentiment is stronger and comes mainly from customer review sites and the independent fashion rating. Trustpilot shows very poor feedback for the main Supreme store, with a 1.7 out of 5 rating based on 563 reviews, and the review snippet mentions serious complaints about customer service and undelivered orders. A second Trustpilot page for Supreme PR shows a 2.8 out of 5 rating from 840 reviews, which is also weak. On the sustainability side, Good On You says Supreme has no evidence of lower-impact materials, no meaningful action on hazardous chemicals in manufacturing, and no proof that workers in its supply chain are paid living wages. It also says the brand is not on track with its emissions target. Together, this points to weak trust on both service and sustainability.