Sustainability Summary
- Good On You - Not found
- Ethical Consumer - Locked
- B Corp - Not found
- Trustpilot - 4.6/5 (781 reviews)
- This is an unclaimed profile. SodaStream Australia has not joined Sustainability Tracker to verify their sustainability credentials. We gathered what we could from public sources.
SodaStream Australia presents itself as a brand focused on cutting plastic waste by letting people make sparkling water at home. Its site says one machine can replace many single-use plastic bottles over time, and it links this idea to a more sustainable future. The brand also has a sustainability section on its website, but the content provided here does not show a full public sustainability report, formal third-party certification, or detailed emissions data. Independent review data in the material is mostly about customer service, not sustainability performance, so the overall picture is clearer on the product use case than on wider ESG reporting. Positive Sentiment Found Public sentiment in the material is mostly positive on customer experience, not sustainability. Trustpilot shows a 4.6 out of 5 rating based on 781 reviews for sodastream.com, which suggests many customers are happy with the brand overall. The review snippets mention quick replies from customer service, easy ordering, and fast shipping. On The Commons Earth, users also say the app helps them choose more sustainable brands, but that is about the app platform rather than SodaStream itself. No independent third-party source in the provided material directly verifies SodaStream’s environmental claims, so the positive picture is mainly about product satisfaction and the brand’s own waste-reduction message.
About SodaStream Australia
- Status
- Unverified
- Website
- Visit Website
SodaStream Australia Sustainability Actions
SodaStream Australia Sustainability Commitments
2024
Keep improving recycled content
In 2024, SodaStream said it would keep developing product changes that reduce environmental impact, including more use of recycled materials and continued work on reusable systems. The wording is broad, so it is more of a direction than a detailed target. No exact end date or measurable goal was given in the material provided.