Missguided

Not verified. Claim this page

Sustainability Summary

  • Good On You - Not good enough
  • Ethical Consumer - This information is locked, visit Ethical Consumer's website
  • B Corp - Not listed
  • Trustpilot - 1.8/5 (3,662 reviews)
  • This is an unclaimed profile. Missguided has not joined Sustainability Tracker to verify their sustainability credentials. We gathered what we could from public sources.
Powered by Tracker AI BETA; there may be errors

Missguided Sustainability Profile

Missguided is not currently tracking sustainability.

Sustainability Summary

  • Good On You - Not good enough
  • Ethical Consumer - This information is locked, visit Ethical Consumer's website
  • B Corp - Not listed
  • Trustpilot - 1.8/5 (3,662 reviews)
  • This is an unclaimed profile. Missguided has not joined Sustainability Tracker to verify their sustainability credentials. We gathered what we could from public sources.
Powered by Tracker AI BETA; there may be errors
Missguided’s public sustainability picture is weak. Independent rating sites describe it as a fast fashion brand with short-lived products, low use of lower-impact materials, and little evidence of strong action on water use, textile waste, or worker protection. Good On You rates it “Not good enough” overall, with especially poor marks for people issues. The Commons Earth also gives it very low scores and says its reporting is incomplete or missing. Customer review sites show very poor service ratings, which adds to the negative public picture, though those reviews are about shopping experience rather than sustainability alone. Common Criticisms: Public sentiment is mostly negative. Trustpilot shows very poor customer ratings for Missguided’s sites, including 1.8 out of 5 from 3,662 reviews on missguidedus.com and 1.3 out of 5 from more than 51,000 reviews on the UK site. Those scores point to widespread dissatisfaction, although they mainly reflect shopping and service experience rather than sustainability alone. On sustainability, Good On You rates the brand “Not good enough,” with a 2 out of 5 Planet score and 1 out of 5 People score, and The Commons Earth gives it 1 out of 5 for materials, slow consumption, and accountability. Both independent assessors say the brand gives too little public evidence of strong environmental or labour action.

About Missguided

  • Status
  • Unverified

Missguided Sustainability Actions

Fast fashion business model

Independent assessors describe Missguided as a fast fashion brand that sells short-lived products and changes styles often. Good On You says this model encourages overbuying and makes it harder to reduce waste. The Commons Earth also says the brand’s approach pushes overconsumption and uses natural resources in a way that is hard to make sustainable without major changes to the business model.

Limited lower-impact materials

Good On You says Missguided uses few lower-impact materials. That means there is little public evidence that it relies on fabrics that usually have a smaller environmental footprint, such as recycled or certified organic fibres. The rating also says there is no evidence of meaningful action to cut water use or reduce textile waste in the supply chain.

No clear worker safeguards

Good On You says Missguided sources its final stage of production from countries with a high risk of labour abuse. It also says there is no evidence that the brand gives suppliers financial security, supports diversity and inclusion in the supply chain, or pays living wages. During the COVID-19 pandemic, it also did not disclose enough policies or safeguards to protect supply-chain workers from the virus.

Low transparency on reporting

The Commons Earth says Missguided’s sustainability reporting is incomplete or nonexistent. That means the brand has not made enough public information available for outsiders to check its environmental and social claims properly. The same assessment gives the brand very low scores for materials, slow consumption, and accountability, showing weak public disclosure across several areas.


About Missguided

  • Status
  • Unverified

Sustainable Development Goals

Missguided is committed to advancing these Global Goals to promote prosperity for people & planet.

 Logo

 Logo

 Logo

 Logo

 Logo

This information references https://www.missguidedus.com/ and was sourced on 15/09/2023. Is this your business? Suggest an edit

Frequently Asked Questions

Has Missguided published a sustainability report?

Confidence: Low. As of July 2026, Missguided has not publicly provided a clear, independently verifiable sustainability report in the sources reviewed here. The Commons Earth says its sustainability reporting is incomplete or nonexistent, which suggests there is little public detail to check. Consumers who want more detail can ask Missguided directly for its latest environmental and labour disclosures.. Sources: The Commons Earth, Good On You - https://brands.thecommons.earth/brand-rating/221/missguided, https://directory.goodonyou.eco/brand/missguided

What is Missguided's sustainability rating?

Confidence: High. As of July 2026, Missguided is rated “Not good enough” by Good On You. That rating comes from a 1 to 5 scale across planet, people, and animals. Missguided scores 2/5 for Planet, 1/5 for People, and 4/5 for Animals. The Commons Earth also gives it very low scores, including 1/5 for materials, slow consumption, and accountability.. Sources: Good On You, The Commons Earth - https://directory.goodonyou.eco/brand/missguided, https://brands.thecommons.earth/brand-rating/221/missguided

What sustainability certifications does Missguided have?

Confidence: Low. As of July 2026, no sustainability certifications are clearly listed in the sources reviewed here for Missguided. That means there is no public evidence here of labels such as B Corp, GOTS (a standard for organic textiles), or ISO 14001 (a system for managing environmental impact). Consumers should ask the brand for any current third-party certifications if they want proof.. Sources: Good On You, The Commons Earth - https://directory.goodonyou.eco/brand/missguided, https://brands.thecommons.earth/brand-rating/221/missguided

What is Missguided's carbon footprint?

Confidence: Low. As of July 2026, Missguided has not publicly disclosed a clear carbon footprint in the sources reviewed here. Good On You says there is no evidence of meaningful action to reduce water use or textile waste, and The Commons Earth says reporting is incomplete or missing. That does not prove the footprint is high, but it does mean shoppers cannot verify it from the available public information.. Sources: Good On You, The Commons Earth - https://directory.goodonyou.eco/brand/missguided, https://brands.thecommons.earth/brand-rating/221/missguided

Is Missguided's packaging sustainable?

Confidence: Low. As of July 2026, there is not enough public information in the sources reviewed here to confirm that Missguided uses sustainable packaging. The independent ratings focus more on materials, waste, labour, and transparency than on packaging details. Consumers who care about packaging should ask Missguided whether it uses recycled content, reusable mailers, or plastic reduction targets.. Sources: Good On You, The Commons Earth - https://directory.goodonyou.eco/brand/missguided, https://brands.thecommons.earth/brand-rating/221/missguided

Is Missguided ethical in its supply chain?

Confidence: High. As of July 2026, the public evidence points to major concerns about Missguided’s supply chain. Good On You says the brand sources its final stage of production from countries with a high risk of labour abuse, and it found no evidence of living wages, supplier financial security, or strong diversity and inclusion practices. It also said the brand did not disclose enough worker safeguards during COVID-19.. Sources: Good On You, The Commons Earth - https://directory.goodonyou.eco/brand/missguided, https://brands.thecommons.earth/brand-rating/221/missguided

What is Missguided doing about sustainability?

Confidence: High. As of July 2026, the main public evidence shows Missguided is not yet seen as making strong sustainability progress. Good On You says it uses few lower-impact materials and shows no meaningful action on water use or textile waste. The Commons Earth says its reporting is incomplete or nonexistent. Based on the available independent sources, the brand has not publicly shown a strong, verifiable sustainability plan.. Sources: Good On You, The Commons Earth - https://directory.goodonyou.eco/brand/missguided, https://brands.thecommons.earth/brand-rating/221/missguided

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.