Louis Vuitton Sustainability Profile

OUR COMMITTED JOURNEY

Louis Vuitton is a global luxury brand with mixed sustainability signals. Independent ratings show it has some environmental actions, like using some lower-impact materials, recycling textile offcuts, and setting a science-based emissions target. But third-party assessors also say its worker and animal welfare policies are weak, and it does not publish enough detail on supplier locations, wages, or some audit practices. Public review scores are also very low, which suggests customer trust is poor. Overall, the picture is one of partial progress, but with major gaps in transparency and social responsibility.

Positive Sentiment Found
There are a few positive signals in the public material. Good On You says Louis Vuitton uses some lower-impact materials, recycles some textile offcuts, and has set a science-based target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in both its own operations and its supply chain. It also says the brand claims to use Leather Working Group certified tanneries, which suggests some attention to leather sourcing, even though the details are thin. The Commons Earth lists the brand as “Not Yet Rated” rather than giving a negative score, which means it has not been formally assessed there yet. Overall, the positive picture is limited and comes mostly from the brand’s own claims as summarised by Good On You, with only partial independent support.

Common Criticisms:
The strongest third-party signal is negative. Good On You rates Louis Vuitton “Not Good Enough” overall, with a 3/5 for Planet, 2/5 for People, and 2/5 for Animals. It says the brand does not publish an aggregate breakdown of supplier locations, does not show evidence of living wages in its supply chain, and gives only limited detail on audits. It also notes that during the Covid-19 pandemic the brand did not disclose enough safeguards for supply-chain workers. On animal welfare, the source says Louis Vuitton uses many animal-derived materials, including leather, fur, crocodile skin, and snakeskin, and that its policy is not aligned with the Five Domains of Animal Welfare, a framework for assessing animal well-being. Trustpilot reviews are also very poor, with a 1.6/5 score from 2,156 reviews on one page and 1.5/5 from 476 reviews on another, which points to weak customer sentiment overall.