Sustainability Summary
- Good On You - Not good enough
- Ethical Consumer - Locked
- B Corp - Not found
- Trustpilot - 1.5/5 (375 reviews)
- This is an unclaimed profile. Kmart (& Target) has not joined Sustainability Tracker to verify their sustainability credentials. We gathered what we could from public sources.
Kmart Australia and Target Australia show a mixed sustainability picture. Independent ratings say Kmart has made some progress on materials, chemicals, and emissions in its own operations, but it still falls short on worker pay, supply chain transparency, and tracking impacts beyond its direct business. Good On You rates Kmart Australia as “Not good enough,” and Trustpilot reviews for both Kmart and Target are very poor, though those reviews focus more on shopping and service than sustainability. The brand site shows some product choices and services that may matter for waste and convenience, but there is limited public detail on deeper ESG performance. Common Criticisms: Public sentiment in the available third-party material is mostly negative, although it is aimed more at shopping experience than sustainability. Trustpilot shows very low ratings for both brands: Kmart has 1.5 out of 5 from 375 reviews, and Target has 1.4 out of 5 from 259 reviews, with complaints about poor customer service, online ordering, returns, product quality, and stock availability. Good On You also rates Kmart Australia “Not good enough,” saying it does not do enough on worker pay, supply chain labour standards, emissions beyond its own operations, or textile waste. The Commons Earth search result does not add a brand-specific score, but it shows the brand is being discussed in sustainability-focused directories.
About Kmart (& Target)
- Status
- Unverified
- Website
- Visit Website
Kmart (& Target) Sustainability Actions
Kmart (& Target) Sustainability Commitments
2025
Remove hazardous chemicals
Kmart has a target to eliminate hazardous chemicals by 2025. This is a future-facing commitment because it sets a deadline for change. The public assessment does not show clear evidence that the brand is on track, so the commitment exists but progress is uncertain from the available information.