Sustainability Summary
- Good On You - Not Good Enough
- Ethical Consumer - This information is locked, visit Ethical Consumer's website
- B Corp - Not found
- Trustpilot - 1.4/5 (131 reviews)
- This is an unclaimed profile. Bstore For Birkenstock has not joined Sustainability Tracker to verify their sustainability credentials. We gathered what we could from public sources.
Birkenstock shows a mixed sustainability picture. Its own pages say it uses natural materials like cork, natural latex, jute, leather, and wool felt, and that it works on repairs, supply chain checks, and complaint channels under laws such as Germany’s Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (a law that requires companies to look for human rights and environmental risks in their supply chains). Independent sources agree that the brand uses some lower-impact materials and offers repair services, but they also say it still relies on higher-impact materials and does not publish enough clear data on emissions, suppliers, or targets. Public ratings are also weak, with low Trustpilot scores and a poor Good On You result. Positive Sentiment Found Positive third-party sentiment is limited, but some independent sources point to useful sustainability features. Good On You notes that Birkenstock uses water-based glues and offers some vegan styles, while The Commons Earth says it has a repair program, care advice, and some lower-impact materials such as jute, cork, and linen. The brand’s own sustainability pages also describe supply-chain checks, complaint channels, and modern slavery statements, which can help with transparency. Some press coverage and retailer commentary also frame the brand as durable and repairable, which matters because longer-lasting products can cut waste. Overall, the positive picture is more about specific practices than strong independent praise. Common Criticisms: The strongest third-party signal is negative. Good On You rates Birkenstock “Not Good Enough” because it found too little evidence of lower-impact materials, carbon reduction, worker empowerment, and animal-tracing practices. The Commons Earth gives the brand an “Insufficient+” sustainability rating and says it lacks clear public information on materials, packaging, emissions tracking, emissions targets, and supply-chain partners. Trustpilot reviews are also poor, with scores of 1.4 out of 5 on bstoreon.com from 131 reviews and 1.6 out of 5 on birkenstock.com from 2,580 reviews, showing broad customer dissatisfaction. The criticism is not mainly about one scandal; it is more about weak transparency, limited public data, and repeated complaints about service and product quality.
Bstore For Birkenstock Sustainability Actions
Bstore For Birkenstock Sustainability Commitments
2025
Modern slavery statement for FY2025
Birkenstock says it has a Modern Slavery Statement for financial year 2025. A modern slavery statement is a public update on what a company is doing to reduce forced labour and human trafficking risks in its own work and supply chain. The statement shows that the brand plans to keep reporting on this issue in the near term.
2024
Modern slavery statement for FY2024
Birkenstock also lists a Modern Slavery Statement for financial year 2024. This is another sign that the company plans to keep publishing formal updates on labour-risk controls. It does not give full proof of good labour conditions, but it does show an ongoing reporting commitment.