Avant Crystal is an online rhinestone supplier based in Australia. Its website says it sells crystal and rhinestone products for craft, clothing, bridal, nail, and jewelry use, and it ships across Australia and internationally. The available material does not show a clear sustainability strategy, public ESG report, or named environmental certifications. Most of the third-party material found is about customer service and app-based sustainability tools, not about Avant Crystal’s own environmental or social performance. So, the public picture is limited: there is some evidence of normal retail operations and customer satisfaction, but little independent information about sustainability claims, supply chain standards, or climate action.
Positive Sentiment Found
Public sentiment in the available material is mostly positive, but it is about service and app tools rather than sustainability performance. Trustpilot shows strong customer feedback for Avant’s main site, with a 4.3 out of 5 rating from 32,092 reviews, and another Avant Skincare page shows 4 out of 5 from 33 reviews. Customers mention quick service, easy processes, and helpful support. Separately, The Commons Earth app is described positively by users, with a 4.8 out of 5 average app rating and comments praising its brand ratings and climate-impact tracking. None of these sources independently verify Avant Crystal’s own ESG performance, but they do show that the brand name and related tools have generally favorable public feedback.
Common Criticisms:
There is very little independent criticism of Avant Crystal’s sustainability or ESG performance in the available material, mainly because there is almost no third-party assessment of those topics. Good On You’s directory page is only a general search page and does not show a rating for Avant Crystal, so the brand is not publicly assessed there in the material provided. The company’s own pages also do not show a sustainability report, carbon data, or named environmental certifications. That lack of published detail makes it hard to judge issues like sourcing, labour standards, packaging, or emissions. In plain terms, the main concern is not a specific scandal, but a gap in public evidence.
